The Raleigh Rant
In the month since NC HB 2 was passed, the outcry from businesses, churches, and many other organizations, the Governor and the leadership of the NC General Assembly have stonewalled all the opposition to the bill. They claimed that the bill was misinterpreted, manipulated by the media, and used by the opposition to further their agenda. The Governor appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” even though he had avoided all questions from local media for weeks. According to him, it was all a big misunderstanding, and all that was required was a little dialogue to smooth out the rough spots. In spite of the fact that the bill was passed and signed within 12 hours with little opportunity for discussion even within the General Assembly, he only called for more discussion. They have tried to frame the debate as between Christians and secularists, but most Christians object.
The legislation already has caused severe damage to the reputation to the state, cost the loss of hundreds of jobs, and even the United Kingdom issued a warning about travel to North Carolina. The leaders have firmly stood their ground, ignored the protests, cancellations, and general ridicule. They have defended their actions based upon the principle of defending “the public safety” and the urgency of the legislation because a Charlotte Ordinance was about to go into effect. The ordinance was similar to dozens of other cities both nationally and within the state. In other words, they continue to pander to the radical right who has been roused by the big lie and fear mongering.
This legislation was a variation in the wording (but similar in effect) to legislation passed in other states defending “religious freedom,” which in several cases already have been overturned by the courts. This trend clearly is a reaction to the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court declaring the U.S. Defense of Marriage Act as unconstitutional. The result was to make same-sex marriage legal in all states. The so-called Culture Wars are in full passion and fit the mood of the hostile political debates that are dividing the nation before we even have an election.
The LGBT community has been the target of the radical right for decades as they cling to the social norms of the 19th Century and refuse to acknowledge that public opinion is against them. It really is a generational issue, where most young people could care less.
Unfortunately the dividing line runs between North Carolina and Mississippi and the rest of the nation, and the citizens of both states are suffering the consequences. There are six months until the elections, and the leadership of the North Carolina General Assembly has dug into the trenches and seems immune to the public outcry over their ill-considered actions. The attitude of the past five years of “We’re in political control, and we can do whatever we damn well please regardless of how stupid it may be.” Meanwhile, the poor, the unemployed, teachers, minorities, and nearly everyone besides Art Pope suffer the consequences.
A sell-out crowd at the NC Policy Watch’s regular “Crucial Conversations” Tuesday heard a panel discussion on the law passed by the General Assembly last week (HB2) that rescinded the anti-discrimination ordinance recently amended by the Charlotte City Council. The new law applies to all public entities in the state (not just Charlotte) and is effective immediately.
Former legislator and Executive Director of the NC Justice Center Rick Glazier led off the discussion with a list of 18 legal issues with the law that was passed and signed in only 12 hours. Aside from the bizarre breach in legislative procedures, the law has resulted in many unintended consequences.
Mayor Jennifer Roberts of Charlotte was thankful for all of the support in spite of numerous hateful emails. She said, “Justice is not just for some people; it is for everyone.” The same ordinance has been on the books since 1968. They just recently added LGBTQ wording regarding sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. Numerous public hearings were held, and the public supports the ordinance, which only mentions public accommodations, employment and housing. There also was no mention of setting a minimum wage; that issue was added and prohibited by the General Assembly. More than 200 cities have similar ordinances. She has lived in countries without the rule of law, where influence and corruption rule. She will be meeting with the city's lawyers to determine the impact of the new law. The response to HB 2 has been swift, as hundreds of hotel rooms have been canceled as film crews left and three conventions went elsewhere. They will continue to work against discrimination, but they have to live within state law.
Director of ACLU NC Chris Brook compared NC with the South Dakota governor and how he handled similar legislation. When you pass a law in 12 hours, you don't know what it contains and what the consequences may be. Public officials are questioning what the impact will be and how to deal with it. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a Colorado state law that over ruled a similar ordinance in Boulder. He also explained the lawsuit that was filed Monday.
One of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit Joaquin Carcaño told his story that his insurance doesn't cover any transgender procedures or treatments. He works in HIV case management and travels extensively in rural areas, and now is fearful for his safety because of all the negative publicity about transgender people. He said, “We're not asking for special treatment; we only want to be treated like anyone else.” The law will encourage public threats of violence and has no practical means of enforcement nor does it cite any penalties for violating the law.
Robert Chandler with the Small Business Owners Organization noted that they employ half of the private work force. He commented, “We are a pragmatic and practical group, and two-thirds of our owners say the state should not deny LGBTQ people access to the same rights as others and would support federal legislation to enforce that.
Repeal of the legislation is unlikely since 72 state legislators are running unopposed in gerrymandered districts, and the majority who voted for HB2 did so because they could and don't face any political consequences. Enforcement of the law has now been handed over to the state Human Relations Commission, which was defunded last year. So it is unclear how it may be enforced or how quickly the lawsuit may be heard.
Although the general election is still eight months away, we’re in the midst of the primary season. I can’t turn on the TV without some political debate, town hall, political ad, or panel discussion on who’s winning or losing the primaries. The distinction between the two parties on the issue of homosexuality has never been starker. The Republicans still use us as the bogeyman, and the Democrats are finally pushing beyond grudging tolerance to full acceptance. Both parties seem fixated on same-sex marriage and never even mention discrimination in employment and housing. The federal employment non-discrimination act has been bottled up in the Congress for 20 years.
My intent is not to tell you to get out and vote Democratic; you probably wouldn’t be reading this blog if you were not already one. I won’t even argue against the shibboleths of the radical right that seem to make more outrageous statements every day. Even they can’t out-do Donald Trump.
One of the themes of my blogs has been the abuse of the Bible by using it as a weapon rather than a guide. Many in the LGBTQ community hate any organized religion for being hypocritical and not even following its own principles. Of course, the church is made up of people who are human and fallible. We’ve been debating dogma for centuries and have become even more fractured with the passage of time.
I belong to a small (10 – 12) Bible Study group who has managed to stay together for 12 years. We started with the Methodist Disciples series and have progressed to selecting studies on our own. A couple of years ago we used John MacArthur’s studies on Genesis and Exodus that were a challenge because of his fundamentalist interpretations of the Bible. He believed every word was literally true but conveniently skipped over sections that didn’t fit his theology and even made us some theories that weren’t in the Bible. He used the Bible to conform to what he believed, even when it became very convoluted at times.
We’ve recently started on Mark Strauss’s Four Portraits: One Jesus that is a study of the four Gospels. It includes a 531-page text, a series of videos, and workbook. He claims to be evangelical but not fundamentalist. We spent two years on Justo Gonzalez’s 2-volume history of Christianity. We used a couple of Ben Witherington’s III studies on the New Testament and the epistles of Paul. I read Peter Gomes The Good Book and Adam Hamilton’s Making Sense of the Bible even though we didn’t use them in class. We chose not to try the new Abington Press series Covenant, but another class in our church did.
I will admit that I’ve retained very little of the details of the studies with my fading memory and the passage of a decade. I feel like I’ve been through an extended but non-credited seminary. But I’ve learned that the traditions, myths, cultures, translations, and the variety of languages used in the earliest texts provide many opportunities for different interpretations, even of specific scriptures much less the intent of the entire canon.
We have learned as much from each other in our group discussions as we have from the texts, and although we have not used any of the original studies of John Wesley we have followed in his tradition.
I don’t cite any of this to claim to be an expert on the Bible, and I can quote very few passages from memory. But I will say that I’ve learned a lot about Christianity that I did not know even though I was raised as a preacher’s kid who has attended church and Sunday school my whole life.
The new Pope has been calling for Christians to work together more amicably rather than focusing on our differences and our perennial quarrels over dogma. He says we need to stick to the basic messages of Jesus, and I support that view.
Of course, the confusion only increases when politicians claim that their Christian beliefs support their various biases, bigotries, and manipulative demoguery. In fact, some have tried to co-op religion and use it as a political tool to further divide our nation on social, economic, and political issues. America was founded on the basis not only on the freedom of religion, but the freedom from a dominant religion. In the 18th Century most European countries had a state religion that was imposed upon everyone regardless of their beliefs. They fought hundreds of wars over centuries supposedly based upon religion differences, which in fact were simply struggles for power and dominion.
The Hebrew Bible, the Old and New Testaments, and the Koran can all be traced back to the concept of monotheism, i.e. a belief in one God. Civilizations up to and including Rome practiced religions with many Gods and no uniform dogma. Native American religions still feature many Gods.
So what is the point of this discussion about religion and the Bible? Well, for one thing, the preoccupation in public discussion about same-sex marriage has religious proponents on both side of the issue. Jesus spoke frequently of meeting the needs of the poor, yet we still treat them like pariahs. Before the zealots set the Middle East on fire, Moslems welcomed the stranger with great hospitality. Can’t we disagree without shooting each other?
The schisms in the Anglican and Methodist churches over homosexuality seems small compared with the gulf between the Democrat and Republican candidates, who are polar opposites. The media, in my attention, still gives too much attention to the “talking heads” that only search for notoriety by making outrageous statements, and the LGBT media overplays them as well. I am reminded that someone once told me that Jesse Helms was our best fund-raiser. In my blog, I refuse to acknowledge any of the nut cases who rant and rave about how homosexuals are destroying the world. They are to be pitied but not promoted, and some institutional setting would be preferable.
Coming off the very successful conferences of the Reformation Project and the Gay Christian network, I was somewhat dismayed at the anti-Semitic riot at the Task Force’s “Creating Change Conference” that seemed to ignore any LGBT US political activism that supposedly is the “grassroots” orientation of the organization.
The United Methodist Church gave a “preview” of coming attractions at the upcoming General Conference in May with a recent briefing for delegates on human sexuality. I can’t see that the discussion has shown any discernable movement in 40 years, and the haggling about dogma continues. Meanwhile the denomination continues to lose members because it has lost its focus on the Wesleyan traditions. Of course, homosexuality was not an issue in his time. The big issue was slavery, which split the American church for almost 90 years.
So many of my LGBTQ friends decry the hypocrisy of organized religion, and it is hard to defend it, particularly in light of some of the outrageous homophobic, anti-immigrant, racist, and misogynistic statements from the radical right. A lot is written about the splits in Islam, but it seems that we have even more fundamental divisions in the Protestant Church, which is probably why we have 700+ denominations.
I was born and raised a Methodist, and in spite of my frustrations at time I still consider it “my church.” Aside from a few paragraphs in the Book of Discipline, I find that it matches my personal theology more than most other denominations. I’ve been in a Bible Study class for 12 years, and I’m amazed how much that myths, traditions, and cultural mores have diluted the Good News of Jesus Christ into a diaspora of localized fringe elements that focus more on exclusion than inclusion. Where did we lose sight of his vision?
When people tell me that we will never elect a socialist Jew, I remind them that we celebrate the birthday of one every December 25th.